“We would see funds redistributed from the Common Agricultural Policy towards other programmes such as Creative Europe, which offers growth potential”
The UK Parliament’s committee looking at the European Commission’s proposed budget from 2014-20 has given resounding support to the Creative Europe proposals. It asks the UK government to reconsider its position. I’ve written about the committee’s previous meetings here (Ministers view); here (the sectors and EC view) and the preliminary verdict here.
The final report gives a clear overview of the Commissions’ total spending plans, far clearer than anything I can find on the Commissions’ own Europa website: openness, transparency and public accountability are not Commission virtues).
” The cultural and creative sectors contribution to the EU is fundamentally important. We heard compelling evidence that the increased budget proposed by the Commission would stimulate job creation and growth in line with the Europe 2020 strategy. In the context of domestic funding cuts, and the organisations obvious capacity for attracting EU funding, we call for the Government to support a proportionately larger budget allocation to this area, which represents only a very small proportion of the total MFF.
We also call on the Government to reconsider its position regarding the proposed financial facility. Businesses in the cultural and creative sectors often experience greater difficulty in attracting investment than their counterparts in other sectors. The Commission’s proposed financial facility could offer an important bridging mechanism between these sectors and private-sector investment.
We also call on the Government to reconsider its position regarding the proposed financial facility. Businesses in the cultural and creative sectors often experience greater difficulty in attracting investment than their counterparts in other sectors. The Commission’s proposed financial facility could offer an important bridging mechanism between these sectors and private-sector investment.
A welcome call. It is interesting to see that the support for Creative Europe does not match the views of many of its supporters. No mention of forging a closer European citizenship and no mention of artistic and creative benefit. Pragmatic and to the point, perhaps a better reflection of the role of EC funding.
The report also supports increased educational spending and improved EC communications to citizens.
Will the UK government make these arguments at the EU Education and Culture meeting on 10-11 May?
Who knows?