Wisden 2026 “feckless, reckless, legless”, “dribs, drabs, vibes”.

Now, why didn´t I write that in my Wisden Writing Competition entry? The Editor got there first. The 162nd edition of Wisden, the cricketer´s almanack, comes with an editorial explosion. Lawrence Booth, taking time off from his Daily Mail work to edit Wisden, takes England men’s performance in Australia to the cleaners. Most English supporters, and all Australians, probably think he is being too polite. Still, congratulations to the editorial and production teams who managed to slip the report on the tour into this edition rather than wait for the 2027 edition. (Perhaps by then the Editor will have stopped using the archaic “batsman” and adopt batter in both his Notes and match reports.)

On to the Writing Competition, now in its 14th year but still young enough in Wisden terms to be a novelty rather than a tradition. It is sad to report that the number of entries, and participants, continues to decline. Only 64 entries this time, from just over 50 writers (you are allowed two entries.) The lowest ever and the fourth consecutive year of decline. Paul Caswell and David Fraser valiantly continue to enter every year, with two others joining me on 12. Enough of the gloom, let´s congratulate Anand Mohan Gupta on twitter/x https://x.com/amgpathfinder on his successful entry ” Over the wrist, into the wind”. He writes “dark and speculative fiction”. His story will bring back memories for every left-arm orthodox spinner (or indeed any spinner!). How many readers dived into DuckDuckGo (or even Google) to see if there was a “Keith Ward” who played for New South Wales? I liked the internationalism: an Indian author referencing Australia and Sri Lanka! In other respects, the winner follows a well-trodden path which certainly appeals to the selection panel: a first-time entrant and a father/son sub-theme.

An Indian winner fits neatly into the Indian theme of winners in this Wisden. Four of the five Cricketers of the Year, the leading women´s cricketer, the leading T20 cricketer and the Wisden Trophy are all Indian cricketers. The only non-Indians to be “podiumed” are Haseeb Hameed and Mitchell Starc. I´m surprised the editor did not include a new award for the Most Photographed Administrator, named after Jay Shah, who would have easily won the award after his starring role in India´s world cup winners celebrations.

And the Hundred? A short article with the views of ten players, administrators and fans. Some in favour, a few against. Maybe more next year as the competition pans out after its first outing under its Indian majority. Will a Hundred player feature as one of the Cricketers of the Year?

One of the enjoyable quirks to dipping into Wisden is finding the odd comment that triggers further thought. The English season´s men’s batting averages throw up an interesting item for cricket statisticians. They are led by Jadeja, Gill and Hameed: three of the five cricketers of the year. I doubt this has happened before. Hidden deep in the obituary section, reference is made to “Stephen Fry´s controversial MCC presidency”. Here speaks a traditionalist. Why controversial? Fry was quoted after his term of office: “It has a public face that is deeply disturbing, sort of beetroot-coloured gentleman in yellow-and-orange blazers sitting in this space in front of the Long Room and looking as if they’d come out of an Edwardian cartoon.” Who said cricket can be boring! MCC stays on safe ground with the incoming president?

More MCC exclusiveness comes through with a report on its art collection: “For many, a lasting impression of a visit to Lord´s is the art on the walls of the Pavilion” For many??? Entry to the clubhouse is limited to MCC members, their guests and and on a few days Middlesex members and paying visitors on a tour of the ground. Or perhaps at a private event. A fraction of the nearly 30,000 who attend the Tests. Let´s hope the next planned expansion at the Wellington Road end includes a publicly accessible museum and gallery without needing to go into the ground.

Class crops up again in the schools section. Seeking to defend the preponderance of England men´s players from fee-paying schools the author refers to rowing as another sport making headway in state schools. Well there are a few charities doing impressive work with school children but the sport still has a elite reputation. The article on state school cricket tries to be positive about the new Knight-Stokes Cup but is let down with its erroneous statement that VAT has caused schools to close. Those that have closed were failing long before VAT arrived. I was taken aback by the bold assertion in another article that Scarborough is the best outground. No right of reply is offered.

Back to the Writing Competition. My main worry is not just the entries are declining but that the number of first timers is falling. Disturbingly, this year there were only around 25 new entrants to go alongside the repeat hopefuls. Will the entries continue to decline? Will Wisden pull the plug after next year´s 15th edition? Will Wisden do more to publicise the competition? For those planning to enter, there is a major change in the rules. Entries must “not be influenced by AI”. I wonder how the editorial staff will check this! The Bloomsbury website is yet to note the new rule.

I end with this pitch for the competition (and yes it is AI):

The Wisden Cricketers’ Almanack Writing Competition invites fresh voices to capture cricket’s drama, nuance and enduring spirit. Whether celebrating grassroots heroes or analysing elite performances, entrants can showcase original storytelling to a global audience. It’s a rare opportunity to join cricket’s most prestigious literary tradition and earn recognition from judges.

Ten years of the Wisden Writing Competition

Wisden Cricketers Almanack 2022 appeared a few days later than usual but back to its usual size after last year´s slimmer version. As usual it provides fascinating insights into the game with keen readers spotting the subtle changes but those are for another review!

The Wisden Writing Competition remains, now in its tenth year. A chance for “aspiring” writers to shine with a short essay. The entry level is back down to the normal level with just over 100 entries. Relatively few of the first timers of 2022 tried again. The number of entries from women seems to have fallen.

Congratulations to this year´s winner, Peter Hobday. He gives us a “Proustian Madeline” moment as he opens a long unused bag of his cricket equipment. The smells and touch of gloves, a bat, helmet clothes and other items trigger a Remembrance of Games Past and a wistful thought of a future game.

Mr Hobday´s success is in line with the ten year trends. A first time entrant making it eight out of ten wins for debut competitors.

You can read all the winning entries here.

It´s time for a new records section, the Wisden Writing Competition, the first ten years. Unlike Wisden, accept a possibility of errors in the listings!

Number of entrants: 648

Number of once only entrants 528 (81%)

Most entries: 10 (Paul Caswell, David Fraser, David Potter) 9 (Richard Reardon, Christopher Sharp) 8 (Steve Green, Mark Sanderson, Peter Stone)

Winners on debut entry: 8 (the other two were on their second and fifth entry)

Largest entry 2021 with 193

Smallest entry 2014 (82), 2020 (“more than 80”)

Winners from outside England 1 (USA)

Most popular winning themes Nostalgia of times past 3. memories of specific cricketer 2 , humour 2,

Number of winners mentioning T20 (IPL, Big Bash, Vitality etc) 0

Winning entries looking to future of cricket 0

The competition is open for the 2023 Wisden, closing date is the end of October. A piece full of warmth for the game, a touch of its effect on you, staying clear of controversy. Full details here (under the Photography Competition details which attracts many times more entries!).

Stop press. The runners up are now printed in the Wisden Quarterly magazine The Nightwatchman. 12 are printed is issue 38 and 8 of them are from first time entrants. Yet more evidence that newcomers seem to have a definite advantage. perhaps enter under new names each year?

The Wisden Writing Competition

In 2013, to celebrate its 150th edition Wisden Cricketers´ Almanack opened its pages to the general public.  Well, to be precise, one page of its 1,500+ pages, and it came with a catch.  The Wisden Writing Competition offers the lucky winner the glory of seeing their short essay (originally 480 to 520 words and recently reduced to 500 words) published in cricket’s “bible”. If that was not enough the winner is also invited to the annual launch dinner at the Home of Cricket, Lords.  That’s it, no prize money, no tickets to a Test Match at Lords or indeed anywhere else.  The concurrent MCC-Wisden photographic competition attracts a £2,000 prize and 650 entrants.

There is a consolation prize for all who submit essays: their name in Wisden.  Now this does have value.  For those not playing in the upper reaches of the game around the world (or at one of the privileged public schools) the chances of getting your name in Wisden are few. The best opportunity is if you were a cricketing “personality” or a long serving club player/umpire. You might be named in the obituary section.

The 2020 edition saw the eighth running of the competition; time to review progress.  It attracts between around 80 to 120 entries each year. We can’t be precise; entrants can submit two essays and the very brief review each year does not meet Wisden’s normal standards of accuracy.  For example, the 2020 competition attracted 79 entrants who contributed “over 80” essays.  Over the years the entries have come from “all corners of the world” with Bermuda, USA, UAE, Ireland, India, Italy “and that cricketing stronghold of Valencia” being mentioned (is there someone else in Valencia besides me entering?). Winners are not allowed to re-enter; several have subsequently been invited to write articles in Wisden, an additional reward.

Over 470 people have entered over 760 entries.  Three quarters of them (over 370) have only entered once: enough to get their name in the book.  Some enter for a few years and then give up; others drop in and out. Currently there are eleven who have entered the last five competitions. Four stalwart writers have been ever-present since 2013 and a further eight have passed the 75% mark with 6 or 7 entries out of the possible 8.  I hesitate to call this group the “1st XI with a 12th man”. Despite their over 80 appearances they (we) have failed to win. They (I) clearly write in hope and cling to the adage “if it first you don’t succeed, try again, fail better”.

What do you need to win?  Is there a pattern? Is there a magic hidden code to achieve victory? Here are four pointers.

A man.  All 8 winners have been men.  Indeed the number of women entrants looks to be very low with at best a handful each year.  In the 2020 edition the Editor, Daily Mail cricket writer Laurence Booth, continued his policy of opening the book to women cricketers. Attracting more women entrants seems an area to work on in the future. Perhaps endorsements and encouragements from Emma John or Isa Guha or Marina Hyde?

First timers.  7 of the 8 have won with their first entry (and the other with his second). This is perhaps the most surprising finding. Clearly the winner of the first competition in 2013 was a first timer: everyone was. The second winner could also be expected to be a first timer as people would have seen the first winning essay in the 2013 edition and thought “I can have a go”. Then 5 of the most recent 6 have also won on their debut. Not very encouraging for the repeat entrants! “If at first you don’t succeed, give up”. is not useful advice!

Live in southern England.  6 winners live south or west of Birmingham from Ely to Herefordshire to Devon to the London/Home Counties area; just one has come from outside the UK, in the USA. The location of one winner was not disclosed. Entries may come from around the world and from many counties but there is a clear geographic bias; unintentional I am sure.

A blogger.  This art-form is falling into disuse with the rise of quick fire Twitter but 5 of the winners were bloggers at the time of winning. Most have given up or considerably reduced their blogging since winning.  Another, a vicar, presumably honed his short form creative writing skills in his sermons.  Five, at least, are now active on Twitter.

Those four points cover the who, where and how of the winners.  What about the “what”: the content?   Can we discern any clues, any indicators, any trends? What are the judges looking for, besides good writing skills?

The rules require the content to be “cricket related but not a match report” and not published beforehand: that gives a very wide field to choose from!

The Editor, when launching the competition in Wisden 2012, said “this one page soapbox is yours to do with as you wish” . So how have the winners responded to this challenge? And how open have the judges been to accepting a challenge in the august pages of Wisden?

The first three winning entries were diverse: reflections on South African cricket through the careers of former teammates Kevin Petersen and Hamish Amla; a humorous selection of cricketing references in the works of William Shakespeare and an equally humorous account of a cricketers’ career, albeit a totally fictional creation.

Since then the most recent five winners although ostensibly covering different topics have three common attributes.

Firstly, they provide a romantic and nostalgic reflection on a time when cricket made an impression in the writer’s past.  That time ranges from the 1970s, through to the most recent decade.  The impression may be personal (father/son; a contact with a cricketer, a teams rare victory, or a following a team from afar). There is a fondness for that moment, one that stays in the memory and generates a warm smile; the Cardus and Arlott of long ago.

Secondly, four of the five are written in the first person (and the fifth recounts a shared team experience), a marked contrast to the first three winners. The dynamic has changed. The first three winners were about cricket; the more recent ones about the way cricket impacts upon the writer; they convey a more personal and contemplative internalised understanding of the emotions offered by the game.

and thirdly, they all refer to cricketing events in England (although one looked at an aspect of English cricket from the vantage point of Washington DC).

Wisden looks to the past; it is a book of record, of events of the previous year which will be remembered for decades to come. The winning entries of the Writing Competition reflect that approach.

Entries for the 2021 edition are now open: I (and you) have until to the end of November 2020 to enter. Enough time to reflect, to choose a topic; write draft after draft and keep watching that Word Count. Will the trends and patterns of the first eight years continue? Will we see any tinkering or a radical change? Wisden 2021 will have over 1,000 pages to fill with possibly very little cricket being played. The Quarantine Cup report and scorecards won’t take up much room. I look at my 157 editions for inspiration; that soapbox is there for the taking.